Friday, November 6, 2009

Dishlex Global 300 Manual Free



Is it worth to develop the village up to the limit that any settlement reached the maximum number of points? Is it better stop at a certain level in order to produce more troops? How many players, so many opinions.

Excessive development of the villages are characterized by particularly the less experienced players. The greater the passion to feed points, the higher the level of expanding owned buildings. 12 154 points per village allow them to attain higher rank in the primary. I look better than 9 or 10 thousand. points. But do you really pay to play "on points"?

not protect the village hall
It's a fact that the holder of a hundred settlements have developed up until 1 215 400 points in the ranking. It is true that this gives him a rather high position in relation to other players. But if anyone thinks that the town hall on level 30 will help him win the battle with the enemy - you can only wish him good luck and ... quickly take over its deposits. I usually can not protect them.

Lost points
vast majority of my village is maintained at 9.7 thousand. points. Assuming that they would have 150 in the ranking have "Lose" more than 360 thousand. points. But it does not develop them (or partially taken over storm deposits), to gain a place in the yard. And that - as we know it - typically can accommodate 24 thousand. units. So what I Gain?

One bunker more
If we use cost-effective plan to develop each village and leave it at level 20 town hall and market, and to get rid of the last thirty-level expansion of the sawmill, brickworks and mills - in every village we gain an additional 1,083 places for army. In 150 villages of 162 means 450 units more. Just at a fairly good zbunkrowanie one or more solid deposits ofów, which we will be felt opponents.

300 thousand. soldiers
If we can successfully maneuver the army during the warding off attacks, this amount of defense can effectively destroy at least a few dozen enemy attacks. And there are, after all the players who storm the villages a lot more buildings and in each village are able to produce even an additional two thousand. defensive units. Sediments at 150 it gives them up to 300 thousand. pikemen, archers, sword, or who impede or even prevent getting their deposits.

In such a case really worth it to build its position in the ranking points for the possession of the village? Is it better to fill the barracks of the thousands of extra recruits? What do you think about that?

0 comments:

Post a Comment